Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SDTEST-635] gem datadog 2.3 is now minimal required version #220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

anmarchenko
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?
Now datadog-ci library requires gem datadog version to be at least 2.3 to be able to use agentless telemetry, so I bump minimum required version in gemspec

Motivation
We are going to release internal Datadog telemetry in agentless mode soon.

How to test the change?
Covered by unit tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.92%. Comparing base (529d4e5) to head (9a9877f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.92%   98.92%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         261      261              
  Lines       12387    12386       -1     
  Branches      559      559              
==========================================
- Hits        12254    12253       -1     
  Misses        133      133              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@anmarchenko anmarchenko merged commit ec9ceee into main Aug 26, 2024
30 checks passed
@anmarchenko anmarchenko deleted the anmarchenko/bump_datafog_to_2.3 branch August 26, 2024 13:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Aug 26, 2024
@ivoanjo
Copy link
Member

ivoanjo commented Aug 27, 2024

Nice! I love the "let's use one gem to push folks to upgrade the other" :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants